Bark et al v. United States Forest Service
| WildEarth Guardians, Bark, Cascadia Wildlands and Oregon Wild |
| United States Forest Service |
| High Cascade Inc. |
| 3:2018cv01645 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael W Mosman |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by High Cascade Inc.. (Ghafouri, Sara) |
| Filing 11 Answer to #1 Complaint, Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Filed by High Cascade Inc.. (Ghafouri, Sara) |
| Filing 10 Declaration of Garret Stump . Filed by High Cascade Inc.. (Related document(s): Motion to intervene #9 .) (Ghafouri, Sara) |
| Filing 9 Motion to Intervene and Memorandum in Support. Filed by High Cascade Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Proposed Order) (Ghafouri, Sara) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Schwartz, Jennifer) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Adopting the Proposed Joint Case Management Schedule #6 . On or before November 30, 2018, Defendant will certify and lodge the Administrative Record on or before November 30, 2018. Motions to supplement or complete the Administrative Record due January 4, 2019, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment due January 11, 2019. Defendant's combined cross-motion and response brief due February 8, 2019. Plaintiffs' combined response and reply brief due March 1, 2019. Defendant's reply brief due March 22, 2019. Oral Argument is set for 4/1/2019 at 02:00PM - 03:00PM in Portland Courtroom 16 before Judge Michael W. Mosman. Corporate Disclosure Statement is due 11/1/2018. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
| Filing 6 Proposed Joint Case Management Schedule . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Schwartz, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance of Krystal-Rose Perez appearing on behalf of United States Forest Service Filed by on behalf of United States Forest Service. (Perez, Krystal-Rose) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance of Shaun M. Pettigrew appearing on behalf of United States Forest Service Filed by on behalf of United States Forest Service. (Pettigrew, Shaun) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to United States Forest Service. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (rs) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael W. Mosman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 1/8/2019. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 2/7/2019. Pretrial Order is due by 2/7/2019. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (rs)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5546965 Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Bark against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons). (Schwartz, Jennifer) Modified on 9/10/2018 to add payment information (ecp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
