Mogler v. Hendrix et al
| Jason Todd Mogler |
| DeWayne Hendrix, Michael Carvajal and Andrew Grasley |
| 3:2022cv00191 |
| February 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John V Acosta |
| Jeffrey J Armistead |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Armistead. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/24/2022.) (cw) |
| Filing 4 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Jason Todd Mogler. (dsg) |
Filing 3
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff must submit the $402.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff's failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action. Signed on 2/7/2022 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (Deposited order and IFP application in outgoing mail to pro se party on 2/7/2022.) (dsg)
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 2/4/2022.) (joha) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. (NO IFP Filed, NO Filing Fee Paid) Filed by Jason Todd Mogler against All Defendants. (joha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
