Canales-Robles et al v. Peters et al
||Hector Fernando Canales-Robles and Saamir Lopez-Cervantes
||Dan Berger, John and Jane Does 1-20, David Hansen, Darin Humphries, Robert Jester, Bobby Mink, Colette S. Peters, Michael Riggins, Sid Thompson and Max Williams
||July 8, 2016
||US District Court for the District of Oregon
||Eugene (6) Office
||John V. Acosta
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 1, 2018
ORDER The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acostas Findings and Recommendation 54 . Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion to Amend 36 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is denied as to all claims against Defendant Humphreys and the fir st, second, third and fifth causes of action. The fourth cause of action as brought by the OYA class should also be amended to proceed only against Defendants OLeary and Berger. Plaintiff shall file hisamended complaint within 30 days of this Order (BY 11/1/18). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 1st day of October, 2018, by United States District Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (peg)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?