Lewis v. City of Springfield et al
| Shane Anthony Lewis |
| Pete Kirkpatrick, Springfield Police Department and City of Springfield |
| 6:2019cv00748 |
| May 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Ann L Aiken |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT, action dismissed. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 5/29/19.) (kf) |
Filing 7
Order of Dismissal. Application to Proceed In forma Pauperis #2 granted, action dismissed, all pending motions denied as moot. Signed on 5/29/19 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 5/29/19.) (kf)
|
| Filing 6 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (kf) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Copy mailed to pro se party 5/10/19.) (kf) Modified text to add mailing on 5/10/2019 (kf). |
| Filing 4 Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel filed by Shane Anthony Lewis. (kf) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Shane Anthony Lewis. (kf) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed IFP filed by Shane Anthony Lewis. (kf) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Shane Anthony Lewis against City of Springfield, Springfield Police Department, Pete Kirkpatrick. (kf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
