Muhammad v. Kelly et al
| Tariq Muhammad |
| Brandon Kelly and Cpl. Stair |
| 6:2021cv00077 |
| January 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael H Simon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Tariq Muhammad. (dsg)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver of Service is due by 4/7/2021.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/9/2021.) (Emailed notice and complaint to ODOJ.) (dsg)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO COLLECT INMATEFILING FEE: Plaintiff's provisional in forma pauperis status is CONFIRMED. IT IS ORDERED that the Oregon Department of Corrections shall collect payments from Plaintiff's prison trust account and forward those payments to the Clerk of Court. Signed on 3/8/2021 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/9/2021.) (dsg)
|
|
Filing 4
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. Filed by Tariq Muhammad. (joha)
|
|
Filing 3
Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Tariq Muhammad. (dsg)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael H. Simon. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 1/19/2021.) (dsg)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. NO FEE, NO IFP. Filed by Tariq Muhammad against Brandon Kelly, Stair. (dsg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
