Vega-Flores v. Kelly
Petitioner: Gustavo Vega-Flores
Respondent: Brandon Kelly
Case Number: 6:2021cv01106
Filed: July 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: John Jelderks
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2021 Filing 10 Notice of Attorney Substitution: Oliver W. Loewy is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Lisa Hay . Filed by Gustavo Vega-Flores. (Loewy, Oliver)
August 13, 2021 Filing Fee in amount of $5.00 collected; Receipt No. 94567 issued. (ljp)
August 9, 2021 Filing 9 Notice of Attorney Substitution: Samuel A. Kubernick is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Lynn David Larsen . Filed by Brandon Kelly. (Kubernick, Samuel)
August 4, 2021 Filing 8 Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Scheduling Order upon the State Attorney General on behalf of Brandon Kelly. Filed by Brandon Kelly. (Larsen, Lynn)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Habeas Corpus Scheduling Order Serving Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 #2 on respondent. Answer is due by 10/4/2021. Signed on 8/3/2021 by Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (Attachments: #1 Acceptance and Acknowledgment, #2 Petition) (dsg)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel #3 is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender, 101 S.W. Main, Suite 1700, Portland, Oregon 97204, is appointed to represent Petitioner in this proceeding. Signed on 8/3/2021 by Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 8/4/2021.) (dsg)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS : IT IS ORDERED that the provisional in forma pauperis status given the Petitioner is confirmed. The Petition may go forward without the payment of fees or costs. Signed on 8/3/2021 by Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 8/4/2021.) (dsg)
July 28, 2021 Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/28/2021.) (joha).
July 26, 2021 Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Gustavo Vega-Flores. (joha)
July 26, 2021 Filing 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254 - State). Filed by Gustavo Vega-Flores against Brandon Kelly. (joha)
July 26, 2021 Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Gustavo Vega-Flores. (joha)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vega-Flores v. Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gustavo Vega-Flores
Represented By: Oliver W. Loewy
Represented By: Lisa Hay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brandon Kelly
Represented By: Lynn David Larsen
Represented By: Samuel A. Kubernick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?