Foust v. Brown et al
| Jessica Anne Marie Foust and John Chapman |
| Kate Brown, Colette Peters, Garrett Laney, Captain Jon Hyde, Captain G. Ross, Joshua Wagner, Superintendent Brian Kelly, Garfield, Thomas, Kristine Gates and John and Jane Does 1-20 |
| 6:2021cv01440 |
| October 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mustafa T Kasubhai |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (dsg) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 10/1/2021.) (dsg) |
| Filing 4 Declaration of Jessica Anne Marie Foust. Filed by Jessica Anne Marie Foust. (Related document(s): Motion to Appoint Counsel #3 .) (dsg) |
| Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Jessica Anne Marie Foust. (dsg) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Jessica Anne Marie Foust against Kate Brown, John and Jane Does 1-20, Garfield, Kristine Gates, Jon Hyde, Brian Kelly, Garrett Laney, Colette Peters, G. Ross, Thomas, Joshua Wagner (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (dsg) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Jessica Anne Marie Foust. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
