BAILEY et al v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
| DEMETRIUS BAILEY and SCOTT DRAKE |
| GAULIK, MACGREGGOR, LAZAR, THOMAS, K. MARSHALL, T. ACHEY, J. McCUSKER, GONZOLAS, DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, SYLVIA PALLOTT, MARY CANINO, WENDY MOYER, NICHOLAS SCHARFF, JULIE KNAUER, MYRON STANISHEFSKI, ARIUS, WILLIAM BANTA, STOTT, CAMPBELL, ANDREW, PETERSON, DELAHANTY, JOHN DOE, MARK, TALIFIRO, HEATHER CRAITER, TROWER and E. THOMAS |
| 2:2007cv00719 |
| February 22, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Prison Condition Office |
| Montgomery |
| THOMAS N. ONEILL |
| Defendant |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS THOMAS ACHEY, HEATHER CRAITER, STEVEN GAVLIK, JOHN LOZAR, KEVIN MACGREGGOR, JEFFREY MCCUSKER, ANDREW THOMAS AND JEFFREY TROWER AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF DEMETRIUS BAILEY ON ALL COUNTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 2/8/11. 2/8/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO TO EXCLUDE THE EVIDENCE OF PRIOR ARRESTS AND CONVICTIONS, AND HISTORY OF INCARCERATION IS HEREBY GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXLUDE EVIDENCE OF PRIOR ARRESTS, CONVICTIONS OR INCARCERATION HISTORIES OF PLAINTIFF'S WITNESSES IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE EVIDENCE OF ANY PRISON DISCIPLINARY RECORDS OF PLAINTIFF'S WITNESSES A. WASHINGTON, M. L ESLIE, C. SMITH, AND J. WILLIAMS IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXLUDE EVIDENCE OF ANY OF BAILEY'S PRISON DISCIPLINARY RECORDS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF MISCONDUCT REPORT NUMBERS A869299 AND A656219 IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EX CLUDE THE EVIDENCE OF THE INVESTIGATIONS OF LIEUTENANT HUGH OWENS REGARDING DEFENDANTS' ALLEGED ASSAULTS ON PLAINTIFF, AS WELL AS LT. OWENS' INTERVIEW, IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 7/23/2010. 7/23/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(kp, )
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' UNCONTESTED MOTION FOR JUDGEMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS DIGUGLIELMO, PALLOT, CANINO, MOYER, KNAUER, CAMPBELL, STOTT AND STANISHEFSKI IS GRANTED AND THE COMPLAINT AGAINST SAID DEFENDANTS IS HEREBY DISMISSED.; DEFENDANTS 9; MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS BANTA AND LOZAR IS DENIED. WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS OF RETALIATORY ASSULT AND DELIBERTATE INDIFFERENCE ARISING OUT OF THE 12/15/06 INCIDENT AND GRANTED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS; DEFENDA NTS' UNCONTESTED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED AND COUNT III IS DISMISSED ; AND DEFENDANTS UNCONTESTED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF'S ALLEGATIONS OF RETALIATORY T RANSFER FROM SCI GRATERFORD TO SCI HUNTINGDON IS GRANTED AND THAT CLAIM IS DISMISSED. IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS PLAINTIFF'S RETALIATION CLAIM MAY PROCEED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 1/28/10. 1/29/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
