BUSSINGER v. THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
GEORGE S. BUSSINGER |
THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, JOSEPH GLYNN, LOUIS GIORIA, JOHN DELANEY, ERIC RUHLAND, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LAW DEPARTMENT, ALFREDO WHITE, LEON KING, WALTER DUNLEAVY and J. R. ANDERSON |
2:2007cv03994 |
September 24, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
JAMES T. GILES |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER THAT THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT ARE DISMISSED WITIH PREJUDICE; DEFENDANT WALTER DUNLEAVY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMEN T IS GRANTED AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT DUNLEAVY ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; DEFENDANT LOUIS GIROLA, JOHN DELANEY, ERIC RUHLAND, ALFREDI WHITE, LEON A. KING, JR. ANDERSON, AND JOSEPH GLYNN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ARE GRANTED IN PAR T AND DENIED IN PART. THEIR MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF'S EIGHTH AMENDMENT AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT LIBERTY INTEREST CLAIMS AND THOSE CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THEIR MOTION IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDMENT RETALIATION CLAIM; PLAINTIFF IS PROHIBITED FROM RECOVERING MONETARY DAMAGES ON HIS PENNSYLVANIA CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 8/3/09. 8/4/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.