Cases 1 - 10 of 12
RICHARDSON v. JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2016cv01323
Plaintiff:
WALTER RICHARDSON
Defendant:
JONES, SLACK, LOUIS GIORIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CORIZON HEALTH HEADQUARTERS et al
as 2:2015cv04051
Plaintiff:
ANDREW CHEIREF WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH HEADQUARTERS, JANE DOE, LOUIS GIORIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Goode v. Louis Gioria, et al
as 14-3008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS GIORIA, Commissioner of Philadelphia Prison System, WARDEN CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and FRANK ABELLO, Deputy Warden in Charge of Security of CFCF
QUINONES v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv01758
Plaintiff:
MARCUS QUINONES
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORIA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv02298
Plaintiff:
STEVEN WILSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, MICHELLE SARRELL, LOUIS GIORIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2012cv00756
Plaintiff:
EVAN GARRETT MORGAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, JOHN P. DELANEY, LOUIS GIORIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. City of Phila, et al
as 11-4233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CLERK OF COURT FOR CITY OF PHILA, COLEMAN and others
Chavis v. City of Phila, et al
as 11-4076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DA PHILADELPHIA, DEFENDERS ASSOC OF PHILA and others
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2011cv04556
Plaintiff:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, D.A. OF PHILA., DEFENDERS ASSOC. OF PHILA. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILKES v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv03488
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE WILKES
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, DELANEY and LOUIS GIORIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
