JENKINS v. ANDERSON
Plaintiff: LARRY JENKINS
Defendant: ANDERSON
Case Number: 2:2008cv01035
Filed: February 29, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Prison Condition Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: JAMES T. GILES
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AND PLFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST DEFT ARE DISMISSED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 9/3/09. 9/4/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED.(lvj, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JENKINS v. ANDERSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LARRY JENKINS
Represented By: LARRY JENKINS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDERSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?