DATTO v. HARRISON et al
JEFFREY P. DATTO |
BRIAN HARRISON, THOMAS LEWIS, THOMAS KLEIN, MARK GRAHAM, THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY, THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, INC., JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 4 and JOHN DOE 5 |
2:2009cv02064 |
May 13, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 85 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REOPEN THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASES, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT FOR REASONS STATED IN A MEMORANDUM OF LAW BEARING TODAY'S DATE, THE MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 11/22/11. 11/22/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, ) |
Filing 15 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT FOR REASONS SET FORTH IN A MEMORANDUM OF TODAY'S DATE, THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 9/28/09. 9/29/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(ti, ) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM THE TWO ABOVE CAPTIONED ACTIONS ARISE FROM THE DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF JEFFREY P. DATTO, PH.D. FROM THE M.D./PH.D. PROGRAM OF THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY. DATTO ALLEGES THAT HIS DISMISSAL WAS THE RESULT OF DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION OR RETAL IATION OR RETALIATION FOR HIS COMPLAINTS ABOUT PATIENT CARE. THE TWO SUITS HAVE A COMPLICATED PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND BOTH RAISE SIMILAR CLAIMS. THE DEFENDANTS IN EACH ACTION, WHO ARE REPRESENTED BY COMMON COUNSEL, HAVE FILED MOTIONS TO DISMISS. FOR R EASONS EXPLAINED BELOW, THE COURT WILL REFER TO CASE NO. 09-2064 AS "DATTO III" AND CASE NO. 09-2549 AS "DATTO I, ETC." SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 9/9/09. 9/11/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.