Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bradley v. Fairfax County et al
as 1:2026cv01168
Plaintiff:
Roy LaPorte Bradley
Defendant:
Fairfax County, Kennetg Ande Adilkwu, LEX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis, Sr. v. Bowles, et al.
as 1:2026cv00782
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Lewis, Sr.
Defendant:
Kemsey Bowles, Chadwick Dotson and Colleen Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adair et al v. 3M Company et al
as SC/2:25-cv-11941
Plaintiff:
Erick Adair, Darren Addison, Candice Agli and others
Defendant:
3M Company, BASF CORPORATION, Chemguard, Inc. and others
Adair et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11941
Plaintiff:
Erick Adair, Darren Addison, Candice Agli and others
Defendant:
3M Company, BASF CORPORATION, Chemguard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
James William Faernstrom II et al v. Thomas Lewis
as 8:2025cv01906
Plaintiff:
James William Faernstrom II and Amber Lee Schmutz
Defendant:
Thomas Lewis, Claudia Keshishian, Ralph Ulibari and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ramos et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv07705
Defendant:
The 3M Company, EIDP Inc, Dupont De Nemours Inc and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES RAMOS, Mark Adams, BARBARA AGUILAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Brandon Terrance Watkins v. Andrew Espinoza, Jr et al
as 5:2025cv01635
Plaintiff:
Brandon Terrance Watkins
Defendant:
Andrew Espinoza, Jr, Thomas Lewis, Unnamed Detective and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS et al v. THE 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2025cv12190
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, EIDP, INC., DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES RAMOS, MARK ADAMS, BARBARA AGUILAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
(PS) Johnson v. Lewis et al
as 2:2025cv01058
Plaintiff:
Cassandra L. Johnson
Defendant:
Thomas Lewis, Derek Bancroft, Emiliano Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
