Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Shariff v. Cain
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Abdul Al-Mumit Asad Shariff and Christopher Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abdul ShariffIn re: Abdul Shariff
as 22-60491
Petitioner:
In re: Abdul Al-Mumit Asad Shariff, also known as Christopher Thomas Lewis
Shariff v. Cain
as 1:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Abdul Al-Mumit Asad Shariff and Christopher Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Beaumont Police Dept et al
as 1:2018cv00095
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Beaumont Police Dept and State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher Lewis v. Central MS Corrtl Facility, et al
as 16-60679
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER THOMAS LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and RON KING, Superintendent, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
Lewis v. Doe et al
as 2:2016cv14915
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Lewis v. Central MS Corrtl Facility
as 16-60309
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER THOMAS LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
RON KING, Superintendent, Central Mississippi Corectional Facility
Lewis v. Weatherford et al
as 1:2016cv00065
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Unknown Weatherford, Gulfport Police Department and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Coleman et al
as 1:2015cv00365
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Lashan Coleman, Hubert Davis, Jacqueline Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Lewis v. Johnnie Denmark, et al
as 15-60735
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER THOMAS LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN MARK DAVIS, OFFICER CHRISTOPHER LUKER, OFFICER ADRIAN KEYES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
