Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Lewis v. Lewis
as 3:2021cv00101
Plaintiff:
Carla T. Lewis
Defendant:
Thomas Lewis Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John Lewis v. Harold Clarke
as 20-7642
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN THOMAS LEWIS
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Lewis v. Harrington
as 1:2018cv00866
Respondent:
Patricia L. Harrington
Petitioner:
John Thomas Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert King v. Dennis Schrader
as 17-7242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JOSEPH KING
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS R. SCHRADER, Acting Secretary of Health, JOHN ROBISON, Chief Executive Officer, Clifton T. Perkins Hospital Center, In His Individual and Official Capacity, THOMAS LEWIS, Chief Operating Officer, Clifton T. Perkins Hospital Center, In His Individual and Official Capacity and others
John Lewis v. Michael Wade
as 17-6878
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN THOMAS LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL WADE, Sheriff, Henrico County Sheriff's Dept., LT. ROBINSON, Lieutenant, Henrico County Sheriff's Dept. and DEPTUY AMOAH, Deputy, Henrico County Sheriff's Dept.
John Lewis v. Karen Brown
as 17-6695
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN THOMAS LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
KAREN BROWN
King v. Mitchell et al
as 8:2016cv03804
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph King
Defendant:
Van T. Mitchell , John Robison , Thomas Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Wade et al
as 1:2016cv00835
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Michael Wade, Lt. Robinson and Deputy Amoah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Brown
as 1:2016cv00639
Petitioner:
John Thomas Lewis
Respondent:
Karen Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lanahan v. Lewis et al
as 1:2016cv00823
Petitioner:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Respondent:
Tom Thomas Lewis, Clifton T Pirkins Hospital Center and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
