Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Shariff v. Cain
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Abdul Al-Mumit Asad Shariff and Christopher Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shariff v. Cain
as 1:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Abdul Al-Mumit Asad Shariff and Christopher Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Weatherford et al
as 1:2016cv00065
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Unknown Weatherford, Gulfport Police Department and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Coleman et al
as 1:2015cv00365
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Lashan Coleman, Hubert Davis, Jacqueline Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Gibbons et al
as 1:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Adam Gibbons, Bradley Barta, Ken Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Denmark et al
as 1:2014cv00460
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Johnnie Denmark, Unknown Errington, Unknown Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Frazer et al
as 3:2014cv00577
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Vivian Frazer, Michael White, Tirah Wesley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
as 1:2014cv00235
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00448
Plaintiff:
Allison Shree Barnes, Thomas Lewis Barnes, Clarence Beamon and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company of Georgia, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
