DUKES v. PAPPAS
| MARCUS DUKES |
| CATHERINE PAPPAS |
| 2:2009cv03869 |
| August 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| WILLIAM H. YOHN |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED FOR FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED. THE CLERK SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 7/20/10. 7/21/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER. (jpd)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. ALL CLAIMS FOR NONMONETARY RELIEF ARE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF STANDING. ALL CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF THE PLAINTIFF'S CRIMINAL TRIAL CONVICTION ARE DISMISSED AS BARRED BY HECK v. HUMPHREY, 512 U.S. 477(1994). ALL CLAIMS AGAINST UNITED STATES AND FINRA ARE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE EXHAUSTION REQUIREMENT OF THE FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT. ALL REMAINING CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF PLAINTIFF'S ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS ARE DISMISSED AS BARRED BY THE DOCTRINE OF PROSECUTORIAL IMMUNITY. ALL REMAINING SEC. 1983 AND BIVENS CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF EVENTS ON OR BEFORE 7/23/06 ARE DISMISSED AS TIME BARRED. DEFENDANTS DELANCEY, CURRAN, LEE, FIRNA AND THE UNITED STATES ARE DISMISSED AS PAR TIES TO THIS ACTION. PLAINTIFF IS INSTRUCTED TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS, SPECIFYING THE CONTENT AND TIME OF EACH ALLEGEDLY WRONGFUL STATEMENT THAT THE DEFENDANTS MADE TO FWC MEMBERS OR THE PUBLIC AND IDENTIFYING THE PA RTICULAR DEFENDANT WHO MADE EACH SPECIFIC STATEMENT. SHOULD PLAINTIFF NOT FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AS SPECIFIED THE BALANCE OF THE CLAIMS IN THE COMPLAINT WILL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TR PLAINTIFF. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 2/17/10. 2/18/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jpd)
|
|
Filing
2
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE PETITION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ITS REASSERTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER. IF PLAINTIFF FILES WITH THIS COURT WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS A NOTICE THAT HE WISHES TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION AND THERE BY OBLIGATE HIMSELF TO PAY THE $350.00 FILING FEE THIS ACTION WILL BE REINSTATED AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 9/2/09. 9/2/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER. (jpd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DUKES v. PAPPAS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MARCUS DUKES | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CATHERINE PAPPAS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
