Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
DUKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv90653
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS DUKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv90654
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS DUKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEC v. Marcus Dukes, et al
as 11-1012
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCUS DUKES
Defendant - Appellee:
FINANCIAL WARFARE CLUB, FINANCIAL WARFARE, FINANCIAL WARFARE CLUB NV and others
Marcus Dukes v. Catherine Pappas, et al
as 10-3380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS DUKES
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHERINE E. PAPPAS, Senior Trial Counselor, Securities and Exchange Commission, AMY GREER, (SEC), KATY CODY, (SEC) and others
DUKES v. PAPPAS
as 2:2009cv03869
Plaintiff:
MARCUS DUKES
Defendant:
CATHERINE PAPPAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dukes v. Pappas CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2009cv13036
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dukes
Defendant:
Catherine Pappas
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
DUKES v. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION-MCKEAN et al
as 1:2009cv00122
Plaintiff:
MARCUS DUKES
Defendant:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION-MCKEAN and WARDEN, FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dukes v. United States of America
as 8:2009cv00165
Petitioner:
Marcus Dukes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Dukes v. United States of America
as 8:2009cv00135
Petitioner:
Marcus Dukes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
