HILL et al v. SEPTA
Plaintiff: GEORGE HILL and DAVID ELLIS
Defendant: SEPTA
Case Number: 2:2009cv05463
Filed: November 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: R. BARCLAY SURRICK
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003 Job Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 77 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT SEPTA'S MOTION IN LIMINE IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED IN THIS ORDER. ELLIS'S MOTION IN LIMINE IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO THE DECISION OF THE UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 2/28/2012; 2/29/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(tomg, )
October 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS IS DENIED. DEFT'S REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY FEES IS DENIED, ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 10/11/2011. 10/11/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(tomg, )
December 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED; THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 12/20/2010. 12/20/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(tomg, )
September 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED AS UNOPPOSED WITH RESPECT TO THE SECTION 1981 CLAIM, SUCH CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO THE TITLE VII CLAIM, SUCH CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; THE PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 9/1/2010. 9/2/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(kk, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HILL et al v. SEPTA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GEORGE HILL
Represented By: TANGIE MARIE BOSTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID ELLIS
Represented By: TANGIE MARIE BOSTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SEPTA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?