Cases 1 - 10 of 223
Zahnee v. DONALDSON et al
as 2:2024cv01849
Plaintiff:
Edna Zahnee
Defendant:
RICHARD DONALDSON and SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
HALL v. SEPTA et al
as 2:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
PAUL HALL
Defendant:
SEPTA, TWU LOCAL 234, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. SEPTA 69 ST. TERMINAL et al
as 2:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
PAUL F MITCHELL
Defendant:
SEPTA 69 ST. TERMINAL, DELAWARE COUNTY and SEPTA, MEN/WOMEN STAFF/WORKERS EMPLOYEES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. SEPTA TRANSIT POLICE OFFICER SCHERMERHORN et al
as 2:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
RAFIYQ DAVIS
Defendant:
SEPTA TRANSIT POLICE OFFICER SCHERMERHORN, SEPTA POLICE TRANSIT OFFICER JOHN DOE, SEPTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
ELLERBE v. CEO/PRESIDENT OF SEPTA
as 2:2023cv04877
Plaintiff:
DERRICK J. ELLERBE
Defendant:
CEO/PRESIDENT OF SEPTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Son v. City of Philadelphia, PA et al
as 1:2023cv09541
Plaintiff:
Yong Chul Son
Defendant:
City of Philadelphia, PA, SEPTA Transportation Authority, PA, Gary Brownstein, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
ELLERBE v. SEPTA
as 2:2023cv04134
Plaintiff:
DERRICK J. ELLERBE
Defendant:
SEPTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
