GARVIN v. PALMER et al
UMAR GARVIN |
KEVIN PALMER, ROBERT STOCK, LYNN ABRAHAM, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND COUNTY, CHARLES RAMSEY, SUSAN I. SCHULMAN and JOHN DOE |
2:2010cv01294 |
March 24, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 99 ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOC. NO. 878) IS GRANTED; PLFF'S MOTIONS FOR TEN BILLION DOLLARS (DOC. NO. 95), FIVE HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS (DOC. NO. 96) AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 97) ARE DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT B. KUGLER ON 12/3/18. 12/3/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF. AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, ) |
Filing 22 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT JUDGE SUSAN I. SHULMAN'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 12/30/10. 12/30/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(ti, ) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THIS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND WIHTIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDMENT, THE CLERK SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 6/7/10. 6/9/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED. (COPY TO PRO SE)(lvj, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.