Cases 1 - 10 of 31
IN RE: GARVIN
as 2:2024cv01837
Plaintiff:
UMAR GARVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARVIN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
UMAR GARVIN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER COURT HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARVIN v. PHILADELPHIA CITY et al
as 2:2023cv02872
Plaintiff:
UMAR GARVIN
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA CITY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARVIN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2023cv02874
Petitioner:
UMAR GARVIN
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARVIN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
UMAR GARVIN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARVIN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv03432
Petitioner:
UMAR GARVIN
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and SUPERINTENDANT MS. MASON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARVIN v. CRIMINIAL JUSTICE CENTER et al
as 2:2022cv03357
Plaintiff:
UMAR GARVIN
Defendant:
CRIMINIAL JUSTICE CENTER and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARVIN v. CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER et al
as 2:2022cv01284
Petitioner:
UMAR GARVIN
Respondent:
CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER, PHILADELPHIA AND COUNTY and BERNADETTE MASON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARVIN v. CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER et al
as 2:2022cv00887
Plaintiff:
UMAR GARVIN
Defendant:
CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER and PHILADELPHIA AND COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARVIN v. CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER PHILADELPHIA COUNTYS
as 2:2022cv00749
Plaintiff:
UMAR GARVIN
Defendant:
CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER PHILADELPHIA COUNTYS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
