GARCIA v. CLARK et al
RAFAEL GARCIA |
MICHAEL CLARK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2016cv05743 |
November 3, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
JAN E. DUBOIS |
MARILYN HEFFLEY |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE 8/30/17, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BY U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY, ARE OVERRULED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FILED BY PETITIO NER IS DENIED. PETIITONER'S REQUEST FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS DENIED; AND A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 3/20/18. 3/22/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, ) |
Filing 24 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION UNDER 28 USC, SECTION 2254 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS DENIED; AND A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 10/10/17. 10/12/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.