Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,356
BOPP v. CLARK et al
as 2:2021cv00767
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL CLARK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WESTMORELAND
Petitioner: THOMAS BOPP
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell et al v. Michaels Management Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv04535
Defendant: Michaels Management Services, Inc., Monterey Bay Military Housing, LLC, Clark Pinnacle Monterey Bay, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Mr Steve Bell, Chrissy Bell
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
(PC) Michael A. Yocom v. Newsom et al
as 1:2021cv00906
Plaintiff: Michael Alan Yocom
Defendant: J. Clark Kelso, Bryan Yang, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
PRICE v. CLARK
as 1:2021cv00157
Petitioner: MICHAEL PRICE
Respondent: MICHAEL CLARK
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Busey Bank v. Turney et al
as 1:2021cv02900
Defendant: Ron Briscoe, Joseph Riley Mongiovi, Kirk Tjernagel and others
Plaintiff: Busey Bank
David Brown et al v. Duane A. Hughes et al
as 2:2021cv04412
Defendant: Duane A. Hughes, Workhorse Group Inc., Stephen Fleming and others
Plaintiff: David Brown
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Frick v. Spiess, et al
as 1:2021cv00959
Defendant: Charles Rees Brown, Federal Bureau Investigation, Michael Newsome and others
Plaintiff: John E. Frick
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Mark Kistenmacher v. Duane A. Hughes et al
as 2:2021cv04294
Defendant: Duane A. Hughes, Pamela S. Mader, Workhorse Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Mark Kistenmacher
Barry Caruso v. Duane A. Hughes, et al
as 2:2021cv04202
Defendant: Jacqueline Dedo, Harry DeMott, H. Benjamin Samuels and others
Plaintiff: Barry Caruso
WEEKLEY v. CLARK et al
as 2:2021cv00660
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL CLARK
Petitioner: MONROE WEEKLEY, III
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?