Cases 1 - 10 of 481
United States v. Brian Clark
as 24-2493
Defendant:
Brian Michael Clark
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation v. Gym Supply Warehouse, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01229
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital
Defendant:
Gym Supply Warehouse, LLC an Ohio limited liability company doing business as American Manufacturing Solutions, Jason Michael Clark, Andrew T Slone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Heberer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv03110
Plaintiff:
Bruce Heberer, James Roper, Michael Clark and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Arkema Inc, Clariant Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
OLD v. USA
as 1:2024cv01544
Petitioner:
MICHAEL CLARK OLD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Heberer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03385
Plaintiff:
Bruce Heberer, Pliny Jackson III, James Roper and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Stratton v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00667
Petitioner:
Jaime Michelle Stratton and Jared Michael Clark
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Kerley
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Clark
Defendant:
Jonathan Kerley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
