MCPHERRON v. HOGAN
Petitioner: PATRICK MCPHERRON
Respondent: THOMAS HOGAN
Case Number: 2:2016cv06449
Filed: December 14, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Chester
Presiding Judge: GERALD J. PAPPERT
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER THAT THE PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS RELEIF IS DISMISSED AND THERE IS NO CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS MATTER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 3/2/17. 3/3/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER. (jpd,)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCPHERRON v. HOGAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: PATRICK MCPHERRON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THOMAS HOGAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?