Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2024cv02382
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Judge Ana Reyes, Judge Christopher Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Carter v. Hogan et al
as 6:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Elaine Carter
Defendant:
Thomas Hogan and LJS Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Gould v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
William Gould
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Robert M. Calderoni, Nanci Caldwell and others
Lee v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01504
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Bob Calderoni, Nanci Caldwell and others
WATERMAN v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00917
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., BOB CALDERONI, NANCI CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Whitfield v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01317
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Bob Calderoni, Nanci Caldwell and others
Gervat v. Henshall et al
as 0:2022cv60168
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
David J. Henshall, Robert M Calderoni, Arlen Shenkman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Ghoston et al v. Gary Railway Company et al
as 2:2020cv00402
Plaintiff:
Denisha Ghoston, Dennis Ghoston and Dennis A Ghoston
Defendant:
United States Steel Corporation and Gary Railway Company
Not Classified By Court:
Thomas Hogan
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Sterman, et al v. Brown University
as 1:2020cv00358
Plaintiff:
Association for the Reinstatement of Brown Squash, Grant Sterman, Declan McCarthy and others
Defendant:
Brown University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
