Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Gould v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
William Gould
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Robert M. Calderoni, Nanci Caldwell and others
Lee v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01504
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Bob Calderoni, Nanci Caldwell and others
WATERMAN v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00917
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., BOB CALDERONI, NANCI CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Whitfield v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01317
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Bob Calderoni, Nanci Caldwell and others
Gervat v. Henshall et al
as 0:2022cv60168
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
David J. Henshall, Robert M Calderoni, Arlen Shenkman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Anthony Mina v. Thomas Hogan, et al
as 15-1642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY S. MINA
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS HOGAN, DAWSON R. MUTH, GOLDBERG MEANIX MUTH & MCCALLIN, Law Firm and others
Anthony Mina v. Thomas Hogan, et al
as 15-1645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY S. MINA
Defendant - Appellee:
DA THOMAS HOGAN, NICHOLAS J. CASENTA, JR. and JUDGE JOHN MARK TUNNELL
MINA v. HOGAN et al
as 2:2014mc00259
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STOCKER MINA
Defendant:
THOMAS HOGAN, NICHOLAS CASENTA and JOHN MARK TUNNELL
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
Type:
Other Statutes
MINA v. HOGAN et al
as 2:2014mc00221
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STOCKER MINA
Defendant:
THOMAS HOGAN, DAWSON R MUTH, GOLDBERG, MEANIX, MUTH & MCCALLIN LAW FIRM and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
MINA v. HOGAN et al
as 2:2014mc00222
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STOCKER MINA
Defendant:
THOMAS HOGAN, DAWSON R. MUTH, GOLDBERG, MEANIX, MUTH & MCCALLIN LAW FIRM and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
