Cases 1 - 10 of 33
WATERMAN v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00917
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., BOB CALDERONI, NANCI CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
RICHARDSON v. PIERCE et al
as 2:2017cv02393
Plaintiff:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
KEVIN PIERCE , THOMAS HOGAN and COUNTY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. HOGAN et al
as 2:2017cv00478
Plaintiff:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
THOMAS HOGAN and PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. HOGAN et al
as 2:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
KHALIL GILBERT
Defendant:
THOMAS HOGAN and NATHAN SCHENKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCPHERRON v. HOGAN
as 2:2016cv06449
Petitioner:
PATRICK MCPHERRON
Respondent:
THOMAS HOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MINA et al v. CHESTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2015cv05452
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STOCKER MINA, TLC DREAMS FOUNDATION and THE TRUTH TODAY FOR A BETTER TOMORROW POLITICAL COMMITTEE
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY, CHESTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JAMES P. MACELREE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCPHERRON v. HOGAN
as 2:2015cv05379
Petitioner:
PATRICK S. MCPHERRON
Respondent:
THOMAS HOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MINA et al v. CHESTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2014cv06261
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STOCKER MINA, TLC DREAMS FOUNDATION and THE TRUTH TODAY FOR A BETTER TOMORROW POLITICAL COMMITTEE
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY, CHESTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS , JAMES P. MACELREE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MINA v. HOGAN et al
as 2:2014mc00259
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STOCKER MINA
Defendant:
THOMAS HOGAN, NICHOLAS CASENTA and JOHN MARK TUNNELL
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
Type:
Other Statutes
MINA v. HOGAN et al
as 2:2014mc00221
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STOCKER MINA
Defendant:
THOMAS HOGAN, DAWSON R MUTH, GOLDBERG, MEANIX, MUTH & MCCALLIN LAW FIRM and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
