HANDFIELD v. GARMAN et al
| EARL C. HANDFIELD, II |
| MARK GARMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2017cv01634 |
| April 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Chester |
| LEGROME D. DAVIS |
| THOMAS J. RUETER |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER THAT 1. PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(B) (ECF NO. 53) IS DENIED; 2. PETITIONER'S AMENDED MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(B)(1) (ECF NO. 54) IS DENIED; 3. PETIT IONER'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (ECF NO. 52) IS DENIED; AND 4. THERE IS NO CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 1/25/24. 1/25/24 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(er)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR HABEAS RELIEF TO PREVENT A GRAVE MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE UNDER RULE 60(D)(1) (ECF NO. 33), AMENDED 60(D)(1) MOTION (ECF NO. 38), AND SECOND AMENDED 60(D)(1) MOTION (ECF NO. 39) ARE DENIED FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM ACCOMPANYING THIS ORDER. THE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF NO. 35) IS DENIED AS UNNECESSARY SINCE HANDFIELD HAS ALREADY PAID THE $5 FILING FEE FOR THIS CASE. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2253(C). SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 2/20/20. 2/21/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(er, )
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER THAT PETITIONERS 26 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(B) IS DENIED; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS MATTER; AND THERE IS NO CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 9/30/19. 9/30/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mas, )
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; PETITIONERS MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (DOCKET NOS. 2 AND 5 ) ARE DENIED; PETITIONERS REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO AMEND (DOCKET NO . 11 ) IS DENIED; PETITIONERS SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 15(C)(2) (DOCKET NO. 12 ) IS DENIED; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 3/14/18. 3/14/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(mas, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
