Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 94
FRYE v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00642
Petitioner: TARANCE FRYE
Respondent: MICHAEL ZAKEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRYE v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00322
Petitioner: TARANCE FRYE
Respondent: MICHAEL ZAKEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACOBS v. HOLLANBOROUGH et al
as 2:2023cv03340
Petitioner: TYRELL KHALIL JACOBS, JR.
Respondent: KENNETH HOLLANBOROUGH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEE v. TICE, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02968
Petitioner: DOMINIQUE MARSHON LEE
Respondent: ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PURNELL v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2022cv04050
Petitioner: SHERON JALEN PURNELL
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT ESTOCK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FIORENTINO v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI HOUTZDALE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv03501
Petitioner: ANDRE EMMITT FIORENTINO
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI HOUTZDALE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BERNARD v. SORBER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01668
Petitioner: LEONARD BERNARD
Respondent: JAMIE SORBER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEWIS v. HARRY et al
as 2:2021cv04176
Petitioner: WILLIAM LEWIS
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT MS. HARRY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BUSH v. MCGINLEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02106
Petitioner: JEREMIAH BUSH
Respondent: THOMAS MCGINLEY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YERGER v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2021cv01812
Petitioner: WARREN E. YERGER
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT ARMEL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?