FRYE v. ZAKEN et al
Petitioner: TARANCE FRYE
Respondent: MICHAEL ZAKEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 2:2024cv00642
Filed: February 9, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS
Referring Judge: JOHN M YOUNGE
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULE 72.1.IV(C), ALL ISSUES AND EVIDENCE SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND NEW ISSUES AND EVIDENCE SHALL NOT BE RAISED AFTER THE FILING OF THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IF THEY COULD HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE; AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE THE CHESTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 3/22/24. 3/22/24 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(bw)
March 22, 2024 COPY OF DOC. NOS. 1 AND 6 HAVE BEEN E-MAILED TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE OF CHESTER COUNTY. (bw)
March 13, 2024 Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 20018359 SCI-GREENE (va)
March 13, 2024 Filing 4 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER, MICHAEL ZAKEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, filed by TARANCE FRYE.(va)
February 15, 2024 COPY OF DOC. NO. 3 HAS BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE. (bw)
February 9, 2024 Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES. PRO SE NOT MAILED. (va)
February 9, 2024 Filing 2 Copy of USDC EDPA ORDER SEVERING PETITION. (va)
February 9, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by TARANCE FRYE. Envelope. FEE NOT PAID. NO IFP. (va)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FRYE v. ZAKEN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: TARANCE FRYE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MICHAEL ZAKEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?