Cases 1 - 10 of 156
Lavond Hill v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-2171
Plaintiff:
LAVOND A. HILL
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, Superintendent of SCI Greene, MICHAEL ZAKEN and others
Jason MainesIn re: Jason Maines
as 24-2017
Petitioner:
In re: JASON ALLEN MAINES
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, Superintendent, SCI GREENE and GREGORY J. NEUGEBAUER, Cambria County DA
Dwayne Rieco v. Michael Zaken, et al
as 24-1882
Defendant:
ERIC HINTEMEYER, C/O 4, Captain of Security, WILLIAM NICHOLSON, CRNP FETTERMAN, Healthcare Provider and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
JACOBS v. ZAKEN
as 2:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JACOBS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Stoffa v. Michael Zaken, et al
as 24-1638
Plaintiff:
DANIEL STOFFA
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, Superintendent SCI Greene, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FAYETTE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
IGLESIAS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
DAVIS IGLESIAS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, MS. KOIS and S. LONGSTRETH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Zaken
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jacobs
Defendant:
Michael Zaken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NARANJO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
ISAAC NARANJO
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, PA ATT. GENERAL, PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRYE v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00642
Petitioner:
TARANCE FRYE
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEE v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LEE
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, TODD BICKLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
