LOPEZ v. SROMOVSKY et al
Plaintiff: LORENZO LOPEZ
Defendant: JOHN ROBERT SROMOVSKY, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and TYREE C. BLOCKER
Case Number: 2:2017cv02183
Filed: May 12, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Chester
Presiding Judge: GERALD J. PAPPERT
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 2/28/19. 3/1/19 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
August 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT ARE GRANTED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. LOPEZ SHALL SERVE SROMOVSKY WITH PROCESS IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH FRCP 4 ON OR BEFORE 8/31/2018. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 8/17/2018. 8/17/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
June 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER: UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 18), PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 27), AND FOLLOWING AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ECF NO. 26), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED FOR LOPEZ AND AGAINST SROMOVSKY ON COUNTS II, VI, AND VII FOR ASSAULT, EXCESSIVE FORCE AND RETALIATION AND FOR SROMOVSKY AND AGAINST LOPEZ ON COUNT III FOR INTENTIONAL INFLIC TION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS; AND, 3. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED FOR LOPEZ IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000 IN COMPENSATORY DAMAGES AND $15,000 IN PUNITIVE DAMAGES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 6/27/18. 6/27/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kf, )
February 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF MAY FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 3/13/2018. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 2/27/2018. 2/28/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LOPEZ v. SROMOVSKY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LORENZO LOPEZ
Represented By: STEPHEN J. KELLY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN ROBERT SROMOVSKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TYREE C. BLOCKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?