Cases 1 - 10 of 18
REAVES v. ROWLES et al
as 1:2021cv00904
Defendant:
Tyree C Blocker, Joe Doe, Captain Robert Evanchick and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Reaves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angel Thomas, Sr., et al v. Tyree Blocker, et al
as 21-1943
Defendant / Appellee:
COL. TYREE C. BLOCKER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGEL LUIS THOMAS, SR., NORMAN E. GREGORY and GLENN MORRIS
REAVES v. ROWLES et al
as 2:2021cv00166
Defendant:
JOE DOE, O.E. ROWLES, ROBERT EVANCHICK and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH REAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angela Hyman v. Capital One Auto Finance, et al
as 19-2496
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA HYMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
COL. TYREE C. BLOCKER, COMMONWEALTH RECOVERY GROUP INC, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and others
Angela Hyman v. Capital One Auto Finance, et al
as 19-2495
Defendant / Appellee:
COL. TYREE C. BLOCKER, COMMONWEALTH RECOVERY GROUP INC, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BRYAN DEVLIN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANGELA HYMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02867
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Angel Thomas, Sr., et al v. Tyree Blocker, et al
as 19-1774
Not Yet Classified:
MICHELE JAMES, KIM HAWN, PHILLIP CHAMBERLAIN and others
Plaintiff:
GLENN MORRIS and NORMAN E. GREGORY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGEL LUIS THOMAS, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
TYREE C. BLOCKER
LYTER v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 5:2019cv00664
Defendant:
JOHN M. SOLECKI, FRANK PAWLOSKI, DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW LYTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Blocker et al
as 4:2018cv00812
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Thomas, Sr.
Defendant:
Tyree C Blocker , O.E. Rowles , Maurice A. Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. STEINMETZ et al
as 2:2018cv01516
Plaintiff:
D'RON ADAMS
Defendant:
CHARLES H. STEINMETZ, JAVIER GARCIA, DARREN ALSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
