LEAK v. CLARK et al
Petitioner: WILLIAM LEAK
Respondent: MICHAEL CLARK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 2:2017cv02608
Filed: June 8, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: WENDY BEETLESTONE
Presiding Judge: TIMOTHY R. RICE
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 87 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S MOTION (DOC. NO. 84 ) IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO LEAK'S RIGHT TO FILE WITH THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT AN APPLICATION TO FILE A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE HABEAS PETITION. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 9/13/22. 9/14/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE AND COUNSEL; E-MAILED.(amas)
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK TH IS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. UPON CONSIDERATION OF PETITIONERS MOTIONS TO COMPEL ECF NOS. 78 & 79 , IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PETITIONERS MOTIONS ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 7/27/20. 7/28/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(jpd, )
April 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 4/13/20. 4/14/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(jpd, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LEAK v. CLARK et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: WILLIAM LEAK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MICHAEL CLARK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?