PARKER v. PA PAROLE BOARD et al
| CHARLES PARKER |
| PA PAROLE BOARD, D.O.C., THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF |
| 2:2017cv02837 |
| June 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| GENE E.K. PRATTER |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDERED THAT THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO I SSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 5/15/18. 5/16/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd ) (DOCKETED IN ERROR SEE 18-298)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 13) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED. THE PETITION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 3/29/18. 3/30/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER, E-MAILED.(lisad, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
