Cases 1 - 10 of 100
James Raynor v. Mack Bailey
as 26-6966
Plaintiff:
JAMES HERMAN RAYNOR, Sr.
Defendant:
MACK A. BAILEY, Jr., Warden of Lunenburg C.C., JOSEPH WALTERS, Director of VA D.O.C., COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEYS, VA and others
Bell v. DPSCS Maryland D.O.C. et al
as 1:2026cv03581
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Bell
Defendant:
DPSCS Maryland D.O.C., Ofc. Atanga, Carolyn Scruggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Makdessi v. Fields et al
as 7:2026cv00677
Plaintiff:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
Defendant:
L. Fields, Warden king, Unit Manager Dye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. D.O.C. et al
as 3:2026cv02409
Plaintiff:
William Wilson
Defendant:
D.O.C., Jasen Bohinski, Sgt. Coledo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughan v. Virginia D.O.C Classification Supervisor
as 3:2026cv00804
Plaintiff:
Pedro Vaughan
Defendant:
Virginia D.O.C Classification Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birch v. Doe, et al.
as 1:2026cv02234
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Birch and Kenneth C. Birch
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Virginia D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. D.O.C. Medical
as 2:2026cv01416
Plaintiff:
Rickie A. Miller
Defendant:
D.O.C. Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDREWS v. SECRETARY OF DOC
as 1:2026cv24547
Plaintiff:
John A Andrews
Defendant:
Secretary of D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley, Brandon v. Acker, Alana et al
as 3:2026cv00588
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Bradley, Sr.
Defendant:
Alana Acker and Wisconsin D.O.C.
Unknown:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bradley, Brandon v. WI D.O.C. et al
as 3:2026cv00589
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Bradley, Sr.
Defendant:
WI D.O.C., Lt. Bortz, Lt. Vires and others
Unknown:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
