JIMENEZ v. BEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, INC. et al
| RAMON JIMENEZ |
| BEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, INC. and AMARILIS LAFONTAINE |
| 2:2018cv01003 |
| March 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| GENE E.K. PRATTER |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDERED THAT THE MOTION FOR LIQUIDATED DAMAGES IS GRANTED, AND THE MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART ETC.; JUDGMENT IS THEREFORE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST THE DEFENDANT AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO AND SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE, INCLUDING FOR ALL STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 12/3/19. 12/4/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, ) Modified on 12/4/2019 (jaa, ).
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER RE: (1) RAMON JIMENEZ'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 21 IS GRANTED, AND MR. JIMENEZ IS ENTITLED TO BACK PAY DAMAGES OF $8,170.75 FOR HIS FLSA CLAIM; (2) THE DEFENDANTS' AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 26 IS DENIED; AND (3) THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 22 IS DEEMED MOOT. SIGNED BY THE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 6/4/2019. 6/4/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sfl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
