Cases 1 - 10 of 21
United States of America v. Camacho (Serrano)
as 26-3232
Defendant:
OLIVER F. FLORES, LOUIS BORRERO, ALI A. HUSAIN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03198
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brea v. Hardy et al
as 1:2026cv07046
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ramon Jimenez Brea
Defendant:
Robert Hardy, Bozzuto's, Inc. and Michael A. Bozzuto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv23493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. A J Therapy Center Inc. et al
as 8:2025cv02728
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
A J Therapy Center Inc., Ramon Jimenez and M.D. Jose Luis Cruz
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jimenez v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00592
Defendant:
Ms. FNU Smith and Eric D. Wilson
Plaintiff:
Ramon Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00571
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00272
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramon Jimenez v. Best Behavioral Healthcare Inc, et al
as 19-2552
Defendant / Appellant:
BEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE INC and AMARILIS LAFONTAINE, Individually
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RAMON JIMENEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01067
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
