EDWARDS v. MCDERMOTT et al
| GERALD EDWARDS |
| MCDERMOTT and JIM MCMEEKING |
| 2:2018cv04777 |
| November 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GENE EK PRATTER |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR MORE TIME by GERALD EDWARDS. (jl, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER THAT MR. EDWARDS MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ARE GRANTED. MR. EDWARDS COMPLAINTS ARE DEEMED FILED. MR. EDWARDS COMPLAINTS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 8; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 11/20/18. 11/20/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE WITH FORMS.(jl, )
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MR. EDWARDS MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ARE GRANTED. MR. EDWARDS COMPLAINTS ARE DEEMED FILED. MR. EDWARDS COMPLAINTS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 8; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 11/20/18. 11/20/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, WITH FORMS.(jl, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jwl, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against MCDERMOTT, JIM MCMEEKING, filed by GERALD EDWARDS.(jwl, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by GERALD EDWARDS..(jwl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
