Cases 1 - 10 of 49
EDWARDS v. CHRISTIAN
as 2:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
GERALD EDWARDS
Defendant:
COLEEN CHRISTIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gerald Edwards v. James Banpfield
as 23-3137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD EDWARDS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES BANPFIELD
Lawrence v. Judge Suskauer et al
as 9:2023cv81480
Plaintiff:
Gerald Edward Lawrence
Defendant:
Judge Suskauer, Intake Officer, Knight Security Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gonzalez v. James et al
as 1:2023cv01505
Plaintiff:
Jaime Cesar Gonzalez
Defendant:
Joon Kee James, Sabrina M. Kurezeski, Vu Quang Huynh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bane et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv04821
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bane, Francisco Acovera, Investigator Clay Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Bane et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01058
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bane, Francisco Acovera, Clay Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gerald EdwardsIn re: Gerald Edwards
as 22-2744
Petitioner:
In re: GERALD EDWARDS
Respondent:
SANDRA MORGAN, Middletown Code Enforcment OFF/INP
Gerald EdwardsIn re: Gerald Edwards
as 22-2247
Petitioner:
In re: GERALD EDWARDS
Respondent:
KAREN B. RICE
EDWARDS v. BANPFIELD
as 2:2022cv02062
Plaintiff:
GERALD EDWARDS
Defendant:
JAMES BANPFIELD
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
EDWARDS v. CAMPELLONE et al
as 2:2022cv00809
Plaintiff:
GERALD EDWARDS
Defendant:
DOMINIC CAMPELLONE, COLLEEN KELLY, TYNIKA MUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Mail Fraud Injunction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
