ARCHY v. LAMAS et al
| MARCUS ARCHY |
| THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT MARIROSA LAMAS and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER |
| 2:2018cv05447 |
| December 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MARK A KEARNEY |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS MATTER. IGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 1/31/19. 2/1/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(jpd, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH PETITIONER WITH AN APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. ON OR BEFORE 1/18/19, PETITIONER SHALL COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION TO THE CLERK OF COURT OR REMIT THE REQUIRED $5.00 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY REQUIRE WE DISMISS THIS CASE WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PETITIONER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 12/20/18. 12/21/18 ENTERED AND COPIES OF ORDER AND APPLICATION MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(jpd )
|
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jwl, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by MARCUS ARCHY. NO FEE. NO IFP. (Attachments: #1 ENVELOPE, #2 Exhibit)(jwl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
