GUZAK v. VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC CORPORATION et al
Plaintiff: KRISTY GUZAK
Defendant: VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC CORPORATION, JAMES SLOVES, M.D., VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC PROFESSIONALS, LLC, VRAD, VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC PROFESSIONALS OF CALIFORNIA, P.A., VRAD RADIOLOGY ALLIANCE and IMAGING ADVANTAGE, LLC
Case Number: 2:2019cv05543
Filed: November 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JOHN R PADOVA
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Medical Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2019 Filing 5 Memorandum of Defendants in Further Support of Their Petition for Removal and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand and for Sanctions re #2 MOTION to Remand to State Court , Objection to Defendants' Notice of Removal and Motion for Sanctions Under F.R.C.P. 11 filed by JAMES SLOVES, M.D., VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC CORPORATION, VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC PROFESSIONALS OF CALIFORNIA, P.A., VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC PROFESSIONALS, LLC, VRAD RADIOLOGY ALLIANCE. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C)(KROLIKOWSKI, DAVID)
December 17, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by LAUREN ALEXA GREEN on behalf of IMAGING ADVANTAGE, LLC (GREEN, LAUREN)
December 17, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by CHILTON G. GOEBEL, III on behalf of IMAGING ADVANTAGE, LLC (GOEBEL, CHILTON)
December 9, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION to Remand to State Court , Objection to Defendants' Notice of Removal and Motion for Sanctions Under F.R.C.P. 11 filed by KRISTY GUZAK.Memorandum of Law. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Action Complaint, #2 Exhibit Joinder Complaint, #3 Exhibit Affidavit of Service, #4 Exhibit Affidavit of Service, #5 Exhibit Defendant Answer and NM to Complaint, #6 Exhibit Defendant Answer and NM to Complaint, #7 Exhibit Philadelphia Dockets, #8 Exhibit Plaintiff Experts Reports, #9 Exhibit Defendant Experts Reports, #10 Exhibit Case Management Order, #11 Exhibit Order, #12 Exhibit Order, #13 Exhibit Order, #14 Certificate of Service)(FENERTY, JOHN)
November 25, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JAMES SLOVES, M.D., VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC CORPORATION, VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC PROFESSIONALS OF CALIFORNIA, P.A., VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC PROFESSIONALS, LLC, VRAD RADIOLOGY ALLIANCE from COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, case number 180100150. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE207323)(bw, )
November 25, 2019 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by JAMES SLOVES, M.D., VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC CORPORATION, VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC PROFESSIONALS OF CALIFORNIA, P.A., VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC PROFESSIONALS, LLC, VRAD RADIOLOGY ALLIANCE. (bw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GUZAK v. VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC CORPORATION et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC CORPORATION
Represented By: DAVID JOHN KROLIKOWSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES SLOVES, M.D.
Represented By: DAVID JOHN KROLIKOWSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC PROFESSIONALS, LLC
Represented By: DAVID JOHN KROLIKOWSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VRAD
Represented By: DAVID JOHN KROLIKOWSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC PROFESSIONALS OF CALIFORNIA, P.A.
Represented By: DAVID JOHN KROLIKOWSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VRAD RADIOLOGY ALLIANCE
Represented By: DAVID JOHN KROLIKOWSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IMAGING ADVANTAGE, LLC
Represented By: CHILTON G. GOEBEL, III
Represented By: LAUREN ALEXA GREEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KRISTY GUZAK
Represented By: JOHN F.X. FENERTY, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?