Cases 1 - 9 of 9
GUZAK v. VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv05543
Defendant:
VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC CORPORATION, JAMES SLOVES, M.D., VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC PROFESSIONALS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KRISTY GUZAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eagle Bear et al v. Harvey MD et al
as 2:2019cv00163
Defendant:
Barbara Blankenship MD, Banner Health, Envision Healthcare Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Eagle Bear and Willard V Eagle Bear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Virtual Radiologic Corporation v. Tandem Radiology et al
as 1:2014mc00027
Plaintiff:
Virtual Radiologic Corporation
Defendant:
Tandem Radiology, Imaging Advantage, LLC and Direct Radiology, LLC
Movant:
Pro Scan Imaging, LLC
Ramsoft Inc v. Imaging Advantage LLC et al
as 5:2014cv00335
Defendant:
Does, Imaging Advantage LLC and Tandem Radiology LLC
Plaintiff:
Ramsoft Inc
Virtual Radiologic Corporation et al v. Tandem Radiology LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01705
Plaintiff:
Virtual Radiologic Corporation and NightHawk Radiology Services LLC
Defendant:
Tandem Radiology LLC, Imaging Advantage LLC, Direct Radiology LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
A. Thomas DeWoskin v. Imaging Advantage
as 11-6044
Debtor:
In re: Visionary Imaging, LLC
Plaintiff - Appellee:
A. Thomas DeWoskin
Defendant - Appellant:
Imaging Advantage, LLC
A. Thomas DeWoskin v. Imaging Advantage, LLC
as 11-6034
Debtor:
In re: Visionary Imaging, LLC
Plaintiff - Appellee:
A. Thomas DeWoskin
Defendant - Appellant:
Imaging Advantage, LLC
Gonzalez v. Imaging Advantage, LLC
as 3:2011cv00243
Plaintiff:
Alberto Gonzalez
Defendant:
Imaging Advantage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Ozarks Medical Center v. Imaging Advantage LLC
as 6:2009cv03370
Plaintiff:
Ozarks Medical Center and Ozarks Medical Center
Defendant:
Imaging Advantage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
