RUSSI v. SMITH et al
MIGUEL RUSSI |
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER |
2:2020cv04580 |
September 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
ELIZABETH T HEY |
C DARNELL JONES |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(MORANO, GERALD) |
Doc. 5 and 6 Mailed to Pro Se Petitioner. (er, ) |
Filing 6 ORDERED THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTY SHALL FILE SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWERS WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 5, 28 U.S.C. FOL. 2254. IF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FINDS THAT ANY CLAIM IS UNTIMELY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2244(D), HE MAY FOREGO A DISCUSSION OF THE MERITS OF SUCH CLAIM AND FOCUS THE ARGUMENT REGARDING THAT CLAIM SOLELY ON TIMELINESS. AS REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. 3771(B)(2), THE COMMONWEALTH IS FURTHER ORDERED TO ENSURE THAT IN A FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF A STATE CONVICTION, ANY CRIME VICTIMS ARE AFFORDED THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE CRIMES VICTIMS ACT, AS AMENDED JULY 27, 2006. THE PROTHONOTARY, CLERK OF COURT, OR OFFICE OF JUDICIAL SUPPORT OF CHESTER COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH V. RUSSI, CP-15-CR-0003479-2012, AND CP-15-CR-0003768-2012, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 9/30/20. 9/30/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND COPIES OF PETITION #1, LETTER #3, ORDERS #4,5,6 AND DOCKET E-MAILED TO THE DA CHESTER COUNTY AND COPY OF ORDER #6 E-MAILED/FAXED TO THE CLERK OF C.C.P. CHESTER COUNTY(jpd, ) |
Filing 5 ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH T. HEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE CHESTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL - CRIMINAL LAW DIVISION WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. HEY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 9/29/20. 9/29/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND COPIES OF PETITION #1, LETTER #3, ORDERS #4,5 AND DOCKET E-MAILED TO DA CHESTER COUNTY AND PA.ATTY GEN. CRIM-LAW DIV. (jpd ) |
COPIES OF PETITION #1, LETTER #3, ORDERS #4,5 AND DOCKET E-MAILED TO DA CHESTER COUNTY AND PA.ATTY GEN. CRIM-LAW DIV. (jpd ) |
COPY OF ORDER #4 MIALED TO PRO SE PETITIONER (jpd, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED FROM HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON TO HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II FOR ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 9/23/2020. 9/23/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg, ) |
Filing 3 Letter dated 9/13/20, filed by PRO SE PETITIONER MIGUEL RUSSI. "ENVELOPE ATTACHED" (kw, ) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number PPE219100 (dmc, ) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by MIGUEL RUSSI. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 Case Management Track Form, #2 Designation Form)(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.