GARVIN v. SUPERINTENDENT MASON et al
Petitioner: UMAR GARVIN and UMAN GARVIN
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT MASON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Case Number: 2:2021cv02195
Filed: May 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: MITCHELL S GOLDBERG
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER THAT THE CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. THERE IS NO CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 7/2/21. 7/2/21 ENTERED AND MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL )
June 30, 2021 Filing 4 Letter (undated) by UMAN GARVIN (fdc, )
May 25, 2021 DOC # 3 AND IFP (SHORT FORM) MAILED TO PRO SE (rf, )
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH GARVIN WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (SHORT FORM) BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. IF GARVIN SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE HE MUST, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY THE REQUIRED $5 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT OR COMPLETE & RETURN THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, INCLUDING THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATION OF PRISON ASSETS SIGNED BY A PRISON OFFICIAL, TO THE CLERK OF COURT, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 5/24/21. 5/24/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND IFP FORM NOT MAILED.(kw, )
May 14, 2021 PRO SE GUIDELINES HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, GARVIN. (bw, )
May 13, 2021 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
May 13, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by UMAR GARVIN. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED)(bw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GARVIN v. SUPERINTENDENT MASON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT MASON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: UMAR GARVIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: UMAN GARVIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?