BEY v. FOX et al
JAYDE BROWN BEY |
IDEE C. FOX, ERIC FEDER, LAWRENCE SAMUEL KRASNER, KATE BARKMAN, JUAN R. SANCHEZ and KASA REALTY |
2:2021cv05092 |
November 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
EDUARDO C ROBRENO |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE AND THE CLERK SHALL MARK THE MATTER CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 1/11/22. 1/11/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S #1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT #2 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 USC SEC. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WHICH STATES A COGNIZABLE CLAIM BY 12/22/21. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONS IN THIS MATTER UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 11/22/21.11/22/21 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 5 EXHIBITS by JAYDE BROWN BEY. Envelope. (va, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against KATE BARKMAN, ERIC FEDER, IDEE C. FOX, KASA REALTY, LAWRENCE SAMUEL KRASNER, JUAN R. SANCHEZ, filed by JAYDE BROWN BEY.(bw, ) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JAYDE BROWN BEY..(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.