Cases 1 - 10 of 27
BEY v. FOX et al
as 2:2021cv05092
Plaintiff:
JAYDE BROWN BEY
Defendant:
IDEE C. FOX, ERIC FEDER, LAWRENCE SAMUEL KRASNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Artis Carroll, Jr.In re: Artis Carroll, Jr.
as 21-2607
Petitioner:
In re: ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., ET AL. LANCASTER COUNTY OF PENNSLYVANIA, ELAINE CHRISSOS and others
Edward Kennedy v. United States Courts, et al
as 19-5289
Defendant / Appellee:
Juan Ramon Sanchez, Individually and as United States District Court Judge, Kate Barkman, individually and as Clerk of Court and United States Courts
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward Thomas Kennedy
JOHNSON v. BARKMAN
as 2:2019cv04703
Defendant:
KATE BARKMAN
Plaintiff:
R. WAYNE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2018cv05422
Defendant:
D. BROOKS SMITH, STENGEL, KATE BARKMAN and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. DIAMOND et al
as 2:2018cv03067
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
PAUL S. DIAMOND and KATE BARKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PICOZZI v. MCKEOWN et al
as 2:2018cv02532
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PICOZZI
Defendant:
WILLIAM MCKEOWN, BRENDIN GREER, GARY MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOBLE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2018cv02420
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Defendant:
D. BROOKS SMITH and KATE BARKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PICOZZI v. GOLDBERG et al
as 2:2018cv02238
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M.J. PICOZZI
Defendant:
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, KATE BARKMAN, JOHN ARROW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leslie Willis v. Kate Barkman, et al
as 17-1472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE WILLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KATE BARKMAN, Department of Court Records, Wills/Orphans' Court Division, PROTHONOTARY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, Court of Common Pleas Orphans' Court Division, JUDGE KATHLEEN DURKIN, Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, Orphans' Court Division and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
