Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
BEY v. FOX et al
as 2:2021cv05092
Plaintiff: JAYDE BROWN BEY
Defendant: IDEE C. FOX, ERIC FEDER, LAWRENCE SAMUEL KRASNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
JOHNSON v. BARKMAN
as 2:2019cv04703
Defendant: KATE BARKMAN
Plaintiff: R. WAYNE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2018cv05422
Defendant: D. BROOKS SMITH, STENGEL, KATE BARKMAN and others
Plaintiff: DWAYNE ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. DIAMOND et al
as 2:2018cv03067
Plaintiff: WILLIAM L. WRIGHT, III
Defendant: PAUL S. DIAMOND and KATE BARKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PICOZZI v. MCKEOWN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02532
Plaintiff: THOMAS PICOZZI
Defendant: WILLIAM MCKEOWN, BRENDIN GREER, GARY MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOBLE v. SMITH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02420
Plaintiff: THOMAS E. NOBLE
Defendant: D. BROOKS SMITH and KATE BARKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PICOZZI v. GOLDBERG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02238
Plaintiff: THOMAS M.J. PICOZZI
Defendant: MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, KATE BARKMAN, JOHN ARROW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PENDLETON v. TODD et al
as 2:2016cv00587
Plaintiff: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant: RANDAL B. TODD, RAYMOND A. NOVAK, KATE BARKMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIS v. BARKMAN et al
as 2:2016cv00075
Plaintiff: LESLIE WILLIS
Defendant: KATE BARKMAN and PROTHONOTARY FOR ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IBN-SADIIKA v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY; DEPARTMENT OF COURT RECORDS et al
as 2:2015cv01052
Plaintiff: ABDULLAH HANEEF IBN-SADIIKA
Defendant: COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY; DEPARTMENT OF COURT RECORDS and KATE BARKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?