COIA v. ZAKEN et al
| DOMENIC COIA |
| MICHAEL ZAKEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2022cv01986 |
| May 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| PAMELA A CARLOS |
| MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOC. NO. #4 MAILED TO PRO SE ON 5/27/22. (amas) |
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE PAMELA A. CARLOS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE THE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 5/25/22. 5/26/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(mbh)
|
| HABEAS PETITION (DOC #1) AND ORDER (DOC #4) EMAILED TO PHILADELPHIA COUNTY D.A.'S OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL. (mbh) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number PPE240222 (rf, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. (mbh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FILED BY DOMENIC COIA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(mbh) (Fee paid) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
